基尔宫殿近日闹得满城风雨，该说的也说了，该质疑的也质疑了。可是，大家似乎忘记北马槟城的林家大宅也是值得令人怀疑。
据悉，林冠英首长在执政槟城时，扬言将秉承“CAT”标准执政让民心大振，人民普遍认同首长带来的公正、廉洁和透明。时隔一年多，林冠英的标准应该没变吧？林冠英说自己租了一间半独立洋房，月租六千令吉。据了解，这件洋房在租给林冠英之前装修了150万令吉。各位，如果月租六千令吉，那么屋主必须在二十年之后取回装修的成本，你认为这说的通吗？怎么会有人愿意做这种亏本生意？有，如果屋主爱恋帅气又会摆“post”的林首长咯。
当林冠英说自己是最透明的政府时，为什么在众人议论纷纷当儿仍然没有透明化的公布自己的屋子的租约呢？林吉祥在都门炮轰基尔豪宅几轮之后，为什么没要求自己的儿子以身作则透明化以解众人疑窦呢？当大家沉醉在基尔宫殿时，请大家也不要忘记槟城首席部长还欠我们一个透明化！他欠我们透明化公布自己的租约来证明那间洋房是六千令吉租来而不是购买得来。吉祥爷爷，你在要求国阵透明化公布这个那个时中气十足，我想管教儿子应该也不赖吧？吉祥爷爷，看好你！
许多要找寻真相的人都到土地局查询这间豪宅神秘的主人，可惜他们都得到同一个答案，那就是“受指示不能透露”。各位，这是透明化吗？当腐败的国阵执政雪兰莪时，大家还可以查到“查卡利亚皇宫”的登记主人。可是现在，强调自己是最透明的槟城政府怎么会变得比国阵更不透明了？到底是什么原因大家都查不到豪宅在土地局登记主人的姓名？这一点不禁让人有所遐想，心里有鬼不敢公开。
话说回头，槟城首席部长官邸现在被白蚁蛀蚀后，林首长几时要公开招标进行维修啊？这间公家财产应该及早维修否则被白蚁把整间官邸蛀塌之后，又要赖国阵当初发现白蚁蛀蚀没有进行维修哦。为了避免此类事件发生，我觉得联邦还是先准备好拨款为槟城首长官邸进行维修或重建，可能需要两亿左右。
两亿？这个数目非常熟悉吧？没错，就是最廉洁、透明和公正的林冠英首席部长要求联邦政府负责赔偿给豆蔻村发展商的数额啦！林冠英说这是国阵批准的计划，民政说这项土地转让是在3月27日完成的；民政还说这项计划还在恰谈豆蔻村的居民安置，林冠英却让这项土地转让成交了要国阵负责哦。无论谁是谁非，我感到很疑惑，为什么透明的槟城政府不公开一切文件呢？这一点让我们非常质疑，行动党所谓的CAT是不是为了讨好百姓还是为了要求国阵CAT，自己就ABC？
我恳切希望林冠英所领导的政府可以透明化向人民交代这两件事，不要嘴说透明化，做就“私营化”！
请转帖，谢谢
About Me
- Selina
- 在《当今大马》投了几篇稿过后，我觉得自己应该开设一个属于我自己的小天地，记载着我所见所看所闻让日后，我可以回头望去时，看到这些事情陪我一路这样走过来。 这里不会有大家爱听的文字，我喜欢从不同的视角去解读热门课题，我肯定会惹来非议。我也愿意接受非议，欢迎你们的非议，因为这才是交流
Dear Selina,
ReplyDeleteI am least worried about LGE's official resident invested by termites compared to those Chinese schools all over Malaysia. Remember the teacher who fell to his death. Since you want to champion this, pls remind the govment about this.
Back to your main topic, regarding the CAT of the newly rented house. He has mentioned RM6K, just accept it. We got better things to do. I am sure this official stuff has to go thru process for approval. If you do not trust the process, that let's propose to have better check and balance system. Ranting and raving like what you did, not only will not solve problem but people may mistaken you as another dog for geraken. Please be constructive.
About the Khair case, have you given up??? and shift the focus to LGE's issue which is puny compare to the former?? Do not creat smoke scree.
If a human being does not know how to respect other fellow human beings and thinks whoever with different views from him are dogs, is he himself not far from whatever animal he refers others to.
ReplyDeleteWe as rakyat have all the right to question whoever in power of their accountability and transparentcy. If what claim by selina is true regarding the renovation and rental amount. The calculation is simple as follows:
ReplyDeleteRenovation=1.5 million and if borrow from bank with an annual rate of 6%, meaning the borrower have to pay at least RM12k monthly over period of 16 years. So, it's entirely not making sense the owner going to renovate the house for the sake of RM6k monthly rental in return. Then khir case is lot more convincing that LKE case. LKE truly owe us rakyat an explanation if he truly mean CAT else he is no different than BN focusing on abuse of power and engage in corruption or any other hidden agenda. If LKE really do that surely all voter will kick DAP out of the political landscape
各位，最近报章上出现的好像不是6K哦，是四千。因为林首长的房屋津贴是这个数字。
ReplyDeleteutusan said 5k. better LKE explain
ReplyDelete3,
ReplyDeletei hope you will understand that, no the problem of amount. what we want is CAT that LKE mention, do you get i means? khair's case already have many people mention,i still waiting the open house of khair.
beside, may i ask u, why can u acept the statement of LKE without any prove but no believe khair with prove?
thanks for others people who give coment,i dun care how much of the rental, i hope can see LKE show his CAT.
selina you better write in chinese cause that's your strength.
ReplyDeleteYou guys step over 5 pound to pick up 2 cents. If you talk abt CAT, let's be fair that all politicians talk abt CAT, of course, including LGE. But I think all should concentrate on the big tickets first. If LGE said he pay 6K for the rental, that accept it. If end of the year the expenditure is more than
ReplyDelete6k per month that I ma sure there will be auditors works to sort it out.
ReplyDeleteUnless you want to hear that he spent 20K per month for the rented house. If so, are you happier or you will write to condemn him more. You got it.!!
selina，其实，我的意思是，林首长好像在闪烁其辞，而四千这数字说出来也好像在配合他的房屋津贴咯！
ReplyDelete再者，说得越少就越难解释那位“屋主”为何花那么多钱来装修。
但或许无论如何解释，三先生及其他的四、五、六......等位先生应该都会接受的，这一点林首长可以放六千个心。
好控怖的SELINA !!乱放炮！
ReplyDelete自篇自导！！可到香港做导演了.
ReplyDeletestill have fool people read Utusan,
ReplyDeletesome chinese sickener
eddie，
ReplyDelete如果没有内容的评论就不要浪费网络空间，谢谢.
3，
我们在讨论这件事，你何必用其他事情来掩饰或转移视线或混淆大家呢？难道你想加深我们对林冠英的怀疑？哈哈
lin,
我也是觉得就算林冠英说是免费的数字先生也会相信
Selina,
ReplyDeletethe premise to start with is already wrong, you have admitted that you doubt his sincerity. LGE said 4K as his housing allowance is 4K, anything more than that he has to ask for approval. Don't you worry. You better worry about the many millions others swindle - do not get me wrong, I just want you to concentrate on bigger problems. Let DAP/PR grow unless you are against PR. This is a less than 2 yrs govment.
Switch to land, today newspaper, another new case??? If so, how much must the tax payers have to fork out if LGE is to "at a stroke of pen" approve to buy back to gain popularity. We need mature govment and voters.
SELINA，也不晓得是什么道理，基宫这件事可以攻击，林首长的租屋搬屋豪宅装修，就没有一丝一毫可以质疑之处？
ReplyDelete未审讯人人都是无罪的，（不过，有些大鲨鱼是还没审讯，大家已经知道是怎么一回事。）尤其是林首长，相信即使SELINA，也还是对林首长有相当的信任吧？
可是，林首长为什么不坦荡一点，CAT就CAT到底吧！
我不知道SELINA是不是深蓝色的，可是，深蓝色就不可以提出质疑吗？只有红色军才可以质疑林首长？但，谁敢？
如果SELINA真的是深蓝色的，那，你认命吧，在网上在咖啡店咖啡摊在任何场合，尤其是308过后，凡是深蓝的说话没有人会相信会认同的，都是狗屁；而深红的蓝眼的甚至青色讲的都是至理名言，放个屁都是香的。
还有，EVEN不必任何理由来反驳你，你，错就是错！
回SELINA:（如果没有内容的评论就不要浪费网络空间，谢谢.）
ReplyDelete已有内容（你乱放炮的文章误导读者，so 我
的评论如上）
几个傻瓜还和你谈得乐呼，我不必大推理由来反驳你，导演！
ReplyDelete胡说八道，我不如你，还是要说：
大炮王，你是民政的马屁精，包准！！哈哈哈！
相信selina没有放过基宫的意思，只是既然有人觉得林首长在闪烁其辞，他就有必要说得更明白一些。
ReplyDelete谢谢KM和Lin的见解。。
ReplyDeleteeddie,
你说我乱放炮，能举出例子吗？否则你就是在浪费网络空间。308大选时，我和很多人一样把票投给民联，现在我对民联提出质疑也不可以吗？这样都要说成马屁精？我对民联太失望了，我手中一票投错了
Dear Selina,
ReplyDeletePlease visit Malaysia Today - go to "Now Suara Keadilan Spins Like UMNO In Kg Buah Pala Issues". and specifically goto comments posted by BLOODHOUND (July 14, 2009 .
You will understand why we are correcting you. I really like to see postings put up by people not only for our information but we can learn writing skills. But "Electronic Paper" should not spin or be used as propoganda for the wrong party (Bee End) for this case. I am sure after ready the Bloodhound's comment you understand the reasons. Anyway, keep it up.
CAT is CAT and if DAP can't honour it better they watch their own backyard before they start questioning BN and backoff from the CAT propaganda.If LGE cant even bother to answer this serious allegation ask by the rakyat referring to his rented house i really doubt whether the CAT rules apply only when he question his political nemesis BN but not to his own coalition? Or is he simply having selective tactic to dig his political rival weakness but yet so arrogantly nowadays not to bother to be accountable to his supporter query? Or does he truly have something to hide? I hope no one here drag us to the endless dabate and simply accusation of either BN dog or DAP dog as this serve no purpose to our quest and curiousity to gauge Mr. LGE on matter how he can really lead by example? What so difficult for LGE to clarify as he may spend days and nights asking more than more than 100 question here and then bashing on BN? Honestly i am losing faith of PR given so many things happen that really disappointed us. PR is just make up of most indiscipline and unprofessional persons trying to grab every single opportunity assimilate BN. I don like BN either, reasons best left. But we all want PR knows that the 308 tusnami effect and feel good factor for PR is fading and if PR still cant improve and keep fighting between them for this datuk sri ship and that council post i am sure we rakyat will vote them down come the next GE.
ReplyDelete发生在自己身上的事实，他看不到。
ReplyDelete