翁诗杰透过他的“喉舌”《透视大马》表示，和一位女议员的桃色新闻是谣言！那么我就希望敢怒敢言的翁诗杰总会长，不要让我们抹不清楚脑袋，清楚地公开回答以下几个问题揭开我们的疑惑。不要脸你口中的“狗”都不如！因为至少你口中的狗还敢于在第一时间把谜底揭开。我也希望高风亮节的翁诗杰总会长能回答以下几个疑问证明自己的清白：
1，请问翁诗杰总会长为什么用部长官车载送蔡顺梅？
2，请问翁诗杰总会长为什么蔡顺梅在吉隆坡时，夜晚时分你的官车总是停泊在JW Marriot Hotel 附近？
3，请问翁诗杰总会长为什么蔡顺梅在吉隆坡时，你的办公室会出现六国大封相？
4，请问翁诗杰总会长是不是在你家不能提“蔡顺梅”三个字否则屋顶都会被震开？
5，请问翁诗杰总会长为什么你时常在外地公干，蔡顺梅总是和你“巧合相遇”？难道是上天为你俩所赐的美丽机缘？
6，请问翁诗杰总会长是不是在国外公干时，如果“巧合”遇到蔡顺梅就9点回房就寝，否则7点赶着结束饭局然后去卡拉OK，是否真有此事？
7，在沙巴坊间，大家都在流传翁诗杰破坏人家幸福家庭还得蔡顺梅离婚，能不能请你回应？据知你在沙巴的票还是严重落后，不知与此事是否有关呢？
这绝对不是抹黑翁诗杰总会长，而是希望他回答相关问题。记得某位翁诗杰身边的助理责骂我，但是我希望你在责骂我之前，想想你自己说过话的真实性，你说部长行程每天都到凌晨？你以为部长真是铁打啊？骗人也要有脑，不要脑都没有还要帮老板掩饰！而且以你这种条件应该没有陪老板出国吧？请问你怎么确认你老板在国外没有“一人啃五”？
1，请问翁诗杰总会长为什么用部长官车载送蔡顺梅？
2，请问翁诗杰总会长为什么蔡顺梅在吉隆坡时，夜晚时分你的官车总是停泊在JW Marriot Hotel 附近？
3，请问翁诗杰总会长为什么蔡顺梅在吉隆坡时，你的办公室会出现六国大封相？
4，请问翁诗杰总会长是不是在你家不能提“蔡顺梅”三个字否则屋顶都会被震开？
5，请问翁诗杰总会长为什么你时常在外地公干，蔡顺梅总是和你“巧合相遇”？难道是上天为你俩所赐的美丽机缘？
6，请问翁诗杰总会长是不是在国外公干时，如果“巧合”遇到蔡顺梅就9点回房就寝，否则7点赶着结束饭局然后去卡拉OK，是否真有此事？
7，在沙巴坊间，大家都在流传翁诗杰破坏人家幸福家庭还得蔡顺梅离婚，能不能请你回应？据知你在沙巴的票还是严重落后，不知与此事是否有关呢？
这绝对不是抹黑翁诗杰总会长，而是希望他回答相关问题。记得某位翁诗杰身边的助理责骂我，但是我希望你在责骂我之前，想想你自己说过话的真实性，你说部长行程每天都到凌晨？你以为部长真是铁打啊？骗人也要有脑，不要脑都没有还要帮老板掩饰！而且以你这种条件应该没有陪老板出国吧？请问你怎么确认你老板在国外没有“一人啃五”？
传得好象是真的，没有证据。党选已经用过的课题，现再炒冷饭，没人会理，老翁也没得空来理会你这个小女子，除非你是中央代表。
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete作那么多的指责，却拿不出证据，还要人来解释，这不是开天下之大的玩笑吗？
ReplyDelete之前，你有提到说沙巴女议员到交通部闹事，后来他的助理写文章否决你的指责，现在你却又不敢提起交通部闹事的东西。你这种乱乱信口开河的家伙，自己小心最后那几年，积些口德，不然没有好下场！
tell us more about the dog man and woman~!
ReplyDeletewe wana know the truth~!
this are really juicy gossips~!
Dear Selina
ReplyDeletepls visit this website and have your comments:
http://mohlandscam.blogspot.com/2009/03/siasatan-menteri-kesihatan-malaysia_19.html
我们一起积点口德吧。。只说实话不说谎话。
ReplyDelete而且要不停的说
说翁总一啃五的事实
ReplyDeleteMACC probe on Tiong’s allegation against Tee Keat draws a blank PDF Print
ReplyDeletePosted by admin
Wednesday, 07 October 2009 09:48
By Lourdes Charles, The Star
PETALING JAYA: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has not found any evidence to indicate that MCA president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat received RM10mil from Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd CEO Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing for party activities.
It is learnt that investigations by the commission have so far drawn a blank, and nothing has been uncovered to back Tiong’s allegations.
Tiong himself is being investigated by the police and the MACC for fraud, including overcharging and unsubstantiated claims in the construction of the controversial RM4.6bil Port Klang Free Zone project.
Sources familiar with the investigations said the commission interviewed more than seven witnesses, including Tiong and Ong, who has vehemently denied the allegations.
(Ong has since filed a RM500mil suit against Tiong for unfounded and defamatory remarks by Tiong following the Port Klang Free Zone disclosure. The High Court has set Nov 4 to hear the suit.)
Sources said MACC officers, besides questioning all those allegedly involved, also checked their bank accounts.
It is learnt the MACC was expected to submit its findings to its legal and prosecution department, and to the Attorney-General’s chambers for advice.
Tiong, the Bintulu MP and treasurer-general of the Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (SPDP), made the allegations after a report by PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services (PwC), which was commissioned by Port Klang Authority (PKA) to look at the PKFZ project, was released.
The report by the Special Task Force formed by the Transport Ministry on June 10 alleged that Kuala Dimensi, the main developer appointed as the sole turnkey contractor for the project, was involved in possible fraud, including overcharging and unsubstantiated claims which could run up to RM1.6bil.
PwC estimated that based on current projections of revenue and costs, including interest costs, the project could eventually cost RM12.45bil.
Ong, in his statement of claim, demanded that Tiong fully withdraw his defamatory remarks and publish an apology in major Malaysian newspapers of all languages.
The purpose of such remarks, he said, were to tarnish his name.
He said they were published with the element of mala fide by Tiong to obstruct fair and just investigations into the misuse of funds in the PKFZ issue and the role played by Tiong’s company in the controversy.